mullac998
Active Member
Because no deserves your ridicule.So why would you suddenly start defending a total stranger, if it wasnt Lord Henry?
Because no deserves your ridicule.So why would you suddenly start defending a total stranger, if it wasnt Lord Henry?
Lord Henry was not the only pathological liar ive ridiculed, you only have ever defended Lord Henry!Because no deserves your ridicule.
Give me an example.How do you explain that ive had the same identical messages from multiples of his so called ...............
wrong postingGive me an example.
Why would I need to provide that if that's what your good at.YOU give me an example of where YOU have defended other pathological liar, the onus is on you!!
Mayhem stated has stated he has got identical messages so tell me one example.wrong posting
I dont have to send you anything its all being kept in the bank as evidenceMayhem stated has stated he has got identical messages so tell me one example.
Evidence for what. What are you hoping to achieve. But then again you like to keep evidence on everyone you know. Just like how you gave natural philosopher money then took the liberty of getting his address then checked his house out on Google maps then took an image of it and kept for whatever reasons.I dont have to send you anything its all being kept in the bank as evidence![]()
Like i said, the onus is on YOU to provide evidence that YOU have defended other members that i ridiculed, ive never seen any so prove it..Why would I need to provide that if that's what your good at.
YOU have made a serious allegation!!Evidence for what. What are you hoping to achieve. But then again you like to keep evidence on everyone you know. Just like how you gave natural philosopher money then took the liberty of getting his address then checked his house out on Google maps then took an image of it and kept for whatever reasons.