Re: Hello
Hello. The recent responses on your forum are very startling to myself and Tess. Are these common or typical reactions in this forum?
I do realize that people have the inclination to only want evidences for what we are stating. This appears to be natural and innocent psychological reaction. However, while much error is implied with myself and Tess, I observe a tremendous amount of error within other people's responses here in your internet forum.
1 - We are not permitted sufficient amount of time to explain all the changes in our time period in detail. If we mention a concept, and that concept is not explained in superior detail immediately, then a default reaction towards that concept is deemed as being invalid.
2 - I have expressed numerous times that I will respond and reply to each and every question that is directed towards me. It feels like a rain shower and I am trying my best to capture all the drops. However, realistically it will require time to address all these things in the high level of detail that your people are demanding. I entered into this forum only days ago.
3 - Because a concept is viewed as not possible within your people's ordinary technological or evolutionary processe, why therefore does that concept become invalid when there is the high probability that perhaps technology has changed or progressed in other unique ways? I am discovering that people are open minded it terms of what they "hope" and "want", but drastically closed minded in terms of the vast array of possibilities towards technological advancement. Evidence of this closed mindedness is reflected when we mentioned the Macaques. Within the normal animal evolutionary process, yes there is no way the Macaques could advance as such within 150 solar years. However, that concept is immediately rejected without inclination or patience to understand that perhaps a non-evolutionary event or technological imposition occured which 'jumped up' the Macaques' evolution in a quicker. Myself and Tess are not being given enough time to explain things.
4 - This keyboard method of word transcription takes both myself and Tess quite some time to accomplish. We know the functionings of the keys however we have not memorized fully the character and numerical positionings upon the keyboard. Combine this with our daily outings, as well as myself spending time with Tess for her healing process, and also some minor research we are doing, it is impossible for myself and Tess to remain in the internet for a long period of time when it can easily require an hour or more just to offer forth a few responses.
5 - It seems as time movers we are not permitted any 'room' for wording errors or grammatical mistakes. If such an error occurs, great skepticism results. If we acknowledge our error, and openly provide clarification, this responsible act of repair is ignored and preference towards the original skepticsm remains.
6 - In some strange way, it seems time travellers must be void of error, must have advanced knowledge on all things scientific and technological, must know current trends such as some John Tutor person, must have memorized precise dates of events specific to the country where most of your forum members reside in, and so forth. I am personally a 26 year old man. I can no better describe vapor-magnetic technology to a past culture in the same manner that each person here may have difficulties in explaining in detail the mechanics of nuclear fusion to a culture in the Gregorian year of 1750. Most here are aware of current space propulsion methods, however most are likely to be non experts in this field of scientific study and may have a difficult time expressing this technology with superior detail if they 'jumped' back to the Gregorian 1750.
I could mention so much more.
While I do understand the demands placed on people such as myself - time movers or time travellers - I feel just as many demands should be placed upon those receiving this information. Any error or possible concept confusion on the part of mysef or my sister is magnified yet very little patience is given for proper clarification or further expansion of that concept. We mentioned a few concept recently, had our sleep, spent most of the day and evening outdoors, and when returning to this internet forum we find our words are labeled as invalid although we didn't even begin to explain things! However, as I am observing or may predict, responsibility towards the errors within your own behavoir is avoided, justified with whatever means, presumed to be less in error than our errors, and so forth. I do understand your skepticism completely, but please offer forth much more patience and time to allow myself and Tess to explain things. Yornik-del-beshi horror bis-ken!
This situation is becoming very frustrating. Tess had predicted this and therefore was resistant from the start. George warned us with the Templar phrase: "They will demand to reach the heights of the universe, but they will demand the smallest within themselves".
