I did a John Titor email experiment on my ex wife

Joined
Oct 18, 2019
Messages
199
titorite

I have no doubt that Pam is Pam. I'm just an investigator into the John Titor email experiment phenomena. I've been experiencing this phenomena ever since I was a young boy. I used to ride my bicycle by this Police station everyday on my way home from school. Then one day while in the family car as we drove by, there was an empty field where the Police station used to be. I asked my dad what happened to it. He just ignored me. How do you explain things like that? Now as time marches on, the phenomena appears to be connected to memory. I know I've posted my theory on what I think is going on. But a theory is just something made up to help us cope with something that seems unfathomable.
what is unfathomable is that everything that can occur occurs somewhere in some time. For something to exist the opposite or anti-thesis needs to be able to occur. by definition the process causing the anti-thesis to occur needs to know how to cause the process, and knowing how is containing every part of the process within itself to study. Therefore when studying every part is caused to occur to be able to study how to cause the end result. Also, every opposite needs an opposite therefore there is no end to the amount things that can occur. Where are you in these events, who knows what will happen to you a second or milliseconds? A trillion ways to be happy or depressed, a trillion ways to be immortal or die horrible, and more.

please correct if you think one of these statements is logically incorrect.
 

Einstein

Temporal Engineer
Joined
Dec 24, 2004
Messages
3,490
what is unfathomable is that everything that can occur occurs somewhere in some time. For something to exist the opposite or anti-thesis needs to be able to occur. by definition the process causing the anti-thesis to occur needs to know how to cause the process, and knowing how is containing every part of the process within itself to study. Therefore when studying every part is caused to occur to be able to study how to cause the end result. Also, every opposite needs an opposite therefore there is no end to the amount things that can occur. Where are you in these events, who knows what will happen to you a second or milliseconds? A trillion ways to be happy or depressed, a trillion ways to be immortal or die horrible, and more.

please correct if you think one of these statements is logically incorrect.
I think the flaw is our assumption of cause and effect. There is another way to initiate effect with no discernible cause. It's called a time loop.
 
Joined
Oct 18, 2019
Messages
199
I think the flaw is our assumption of cause and effect. There is another way to initiate effect with no discernible cause. It's called a time loop.
isn't time a cause? or an unmovable mover? true, some logic applies to everything. I can't logically prove and describe the logic yet. maybe. just events after infinite?
 

Einstein

Temporal Engineer
Joined
Dec 24, 2004
Messages
3,490
isn't time a cause? or an unmovable mover? true, some logic applies to everything. I can't logically prove and describe the logic yet. maybe. just events after infinite?
Here is an example of a time loop: One day I find a pocket watch on my dresser. I decide to keep it. 6 years later I get access to a time machine and travel back in time to place the pocket watch on my dresser. So if the pocket watch now only exists in this time loop, then it no longer seems possible to ascertain its origin.
 
Joined
Oct 18, 2019
Messages
199
Here is an example of a time loop: One day I find a pocket watch on my dresser. I decide to keep it. 6 years later I get access to a time machine and travel back in time to place the pocket watch on my dresser. So if the pocket watch now only exists in this time loop, then it no longer seems possible to ascertain its origin.
one solution or alternative outcome is, the future is the experience of a persons past but if whatever causing x cant have a cause, just being there is the cause of everything else moving which is time. else, the amount of causes is never ending, therefore never starting.. Is that an abstract accurate description of time.

please correct me If these sentences are viewed to be logically incorrect.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 18, 2019
Messages
199
Joined
Oct 18, 2019
Messages
199
Here is an example of a time loop: One day I find a pocket watch on my dresser. I decide to keep it. 6 years later I get access to a time machine and travel back in time to place the pocket watch on my dresser. So if the pocket watch now only exists in this time loop, then it no longer seems possible to ascertain its origin.
maybe the part of the structure of every object is connected to every object in a way that causes movement based of the native dimensional shapes the objects are in as well as others at the same time..the unmovable mover has movers therefor is everywhere.

correct me if you think these statements are logically incorrect.
 

Einstein

Temporal Engineer
Joined
Dec 24, 2004
Messages
3,490
one solution or alternative outcome is, the future is the experience of a persons past but if whatever causing x cant have a cause, just being there is the cause of everything else moving which is time. else, the amount of causes is never ending, therefore never starting.. Is that an abstract accurate description of time.

please correct me If these sentences are viewed to be logically incorrect.
If you just analyze it a bit you realize that time as we view it is linear. Yet the scenario that I proposed shows time moving in a circle. The rules of reality change. There is no way to view cause and effect anymore in the altered time flow scenario.
 
Joined
Oct 18, 2019
Messages
199
If you just analyze it a bit you realize that time as we view it is linear. Yet the scenario that I proposed shows time moving in a circle. The rules of reality change. There is no way to view cause and effect anymore in the altered time flow scenario.
If you don't view time as linear, and time moves in a way where nothing is connected anything else that is not curved. If something is curved there is no break in the flow of time, correct? more complex shapes can represent what 4,5,6 dimensional space looks like therefor less complex shapes represent what lower dimensional space look like, correct? therefor the thing with the least sides is zero dimensional and anything zero dimensional is a point particle, correct? therefor time is the base of the state of every object based off your enterperation because dimensions are properties of every object because dimensions are the only way objects can be described?

mathatically something that has no sides has no friction therefore can can move without being pushed, correct? but I can't figure it out logically yet.

yet cause and effect is the difference between one event and another.
 

Einstein

Temporal Engineer
Joined
Dec 24, 2004
Messages
3,490
If you don't view time as linear, and time moves in a way where nothing is connected anything else that is not curved. If something is curved there is no break in the flow of time, correct? more complex shapes can represent what 4,5,6 dimensional space looks like therefor less complex shapes represent what lower dimensional space look like, correct? therefor the thing with the least sides is zero dimensional and anything zero dimensional is a point particle, correct? therefor time is the base of the state of every object based off your enterperation because dimensions are properties of every object because dimensions are the only way objects can be described?

mathatically something that has no sides has no friction therefore can can move without being pushed, correct? but I can't figure it out logically yet.

yet cause and effect is the difference between one event and another.
All your statements are false. Reality isn't put together based on your opinions. Each of your proposed opinions have to be experimentally proven before even proposing them.
 
Joined
Oct 18, 2019
Messages
199
All your statements are false. Reality isn't put together based on your opinions. Each of your proposed opinions have to be experimentally proven before even proposing them.
experiences are on way to view reality, but experiences are interpreted by logic, and logic is the way to determine what is true or false. Either my opinions are logical or not, and if they are logical they become facts because logic is the only way to determine facts. science is another branch of philosophy based off a potentially false premise that what occurs in the external world is the only and the part of the whole key to determining the workings of the universe. But science is a type of logic and weather science is the only way to reach a logical conclusion is debatable.

please correct me if you believe these statements are incorrect.
I am not a closeminded person, debating is fun.
 

Einstein

Temporal Engineer
Joined
Dec 24, 2004
Messages
3,490
To me seeing is believing. Just because something seems logical doesn't make it so. Logic follows rules. But are the rules always true?
 
Joined
Oct 18, 2019
Messages
199
To me seeing is believing. Just because something seems logical doesn't make it so. Logic follows rules. But are the rules always true?
Logic is defined by ourselves as ways to determine the truth and consciousness is the tool used to define logic; I think we a systems that can understand itself. therefor that system how ways of operating and those ways could be altered therefor what we perceive of the outside world could be altered. When I see something I like to believe it is occuring, I live by that reality, but I don't understand the rules or all of the hows and whys so I cant be sure.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 18, 2019
Messages
199
To me seeing is believing. Just because something seems logical doesn't make it so. Logic follows rules. But are the rules always true?
do you mean time is a circle physically, or metaphorically? How did you prove experimentally time is circular? By saying there is no cause and effect means there is only cause?
 

Einstein

Temporal Engineer
Joined
Dec 24, 2004
Messages
3,490
do you mean time is a circle physically, or metaphorically? How did you prove experimentally time is circular? By saying there is no cause and effect means there is only cause?
If there is no apparent cause or effect one could point toward a circular time flow scenario as an explanation. Time for us as humans appears to be linear. But the circular time flow explanation could be used to explain how basic particles exist.
 
Top