We are literally all time travelers depending on your definition. Your current travel through time is at a 1:1 ratio.
C'mon, man. Make with the winner. Daddy needs a new pair of shoes.
We are literally all time travelers depending on your definition. Your current travel through time is at a 1:1 ratio.
Sadly, you'd need a very advanced device to travel into the future, determine the probability of error factor to your origin, then determine the plausibility of that future in your worldline in order to determine future winners of events then somehow make it back to your origin worldline. I can only go into the future at a 1:1 ratio like everyone else - and even that ratio is subjective to perspective as time is relative not only to space-time but to perception as well.C'mon, man. Make with the winner. Daddy needs a new pair of shoes.
they would understand the workings of classical computers, but objects are products of their time and cannot necessarily be reproduced easily just because you have better or futuristic technology in comparison. Why do you think it is we don't make things today like we made them 100's of years ago? Because we are limited by our current technologies.
A good/stupid example is Apple iPhone. You have a sweet $500 Sennheiser headset but now you can't use your iPhone for music because it lacks a headphone jack. Limitation of current technologies. Meanwhile the iPhone supports wireless audio whereas your Sennheiser does not.
Limitation of current technologies. They wouldn't invent a time machine to go back to retrieve something. They'd already have a time machine as a tool. You could not reproduce an IBM 5100 easier than you could time travel and retrieve one, presuming we are that close to time travel in our current timeline.How much construction effort is easier than building a time machine and sending a person back in time to retrieve technology that is outdated even in the time period the time traveler arrives in? There is little to nothing made 100 years ago that we don't know how to reproduce. It's simply a question of cost vs. return. In the case of Titor's explanation, duplicating 1960's tech would be exponentially cheaper, easier, and faster than sending a guy back in time to retrieve it. They can build a time travel device but they can't duplicate a silly, primitive 1960's computer?
A time traveler is someone who physically manipulates the fabric of space-time to warp through into another universe or what we call worldline. This movement could be forwards or backwards.Rather than ask if any time travellers are here,
ask what is a Time traveller.
I don't follow. Can you elaborate?Thanks for that, what i meant was reading between the lines.