I have never seen any substantiated proof showing the existence of extraterrestrials.
Here is my honest opinion of Rand Paul and the 2016 election.
Let's suppose that I can really travel back to 1840 in my own worldline and I live there for a few decades and convince a certain John Booth and fellow conspirators to not kill Lincoln. Whats to say he wouldn't be killed by another group of conspirators the next day? or the next week? The point is that some events in history may be seemingly fixed and that the only way to prevent these seemingly fixed events requires a traveler to go farther back in time to change the variables that caused the scenario in the first place. Also, each of these seemingly fixed events can have many permutations. Rand might not even be elected and the events could still be very similar. In fact, if the presidency really is just a puppet position, then the election itself could be an insignificant variable. If he is elected, he has two choices. If he resists, he either succeeds or fails. If he fails, then that probably would mean that he was killed off. If he succeeds, then cheers. If he doesn't resist, then you get something resembling my worldline. When a worldline split into new worldlines, it seems that everything that happens as a result of events that happen prior to a split cannot be changed except by traveling back before the split. To a certain point, he is nothing more than an actor playing a character on the world's stage. I oversimplified that; there are so many more variables that may be plausible and it requires knowledge of motivation to accurately gauge results. At what point does resistance become useless? Is there a point where our actions and ultimately our own persons become insignificant due to the choices of those before us?
Here is my honest opinion of Rand Paul and the 2016 election.
Let's suppose that I can really travel back to 1840 in my own worldline and I live there for a few decades and convince a certain John Booth and fellow conspirators to not kill Lincoln. Whats to say he wouldn't be killed by another group of conspirators the next day? or the next week? The point is that some events in history may be seemingly fixed and that the only way to prevent these seemingly fixed events requires a traveler to go farther back in time to change the variables that caused the scenario in the first place. Also, each of these seemingly fixed events can have many permutations. Rand might not even be elected and the events could still be very similar. In fact, if the presidency really is just a puppet position, then the election itself could be an insignificant variable. If he is elected, he has two choices. If he resists, he either succeeds or fails. If he fails, then that probably would mean that he was killed off. If he succeeds, then cheers. If he doesn't resist, then you get something resembling my worldline. When a worldline split into new worldlines, it seems that everything that happens as a result of events that happen prior to a split cannot be changed except by traveling back before the split. To a certain point, he is nothing more than an actor playing a character on the world's stage. I oversimplified that; there are so many more variables that may be plausible and it requires knowledge of motivation to accurately gauge results. At what point does resistance become useless? Is there a point where our actions and ultimately our own persons become insignificant due to the choices of those before us?