Sliders
Member
- Messages
- 158
Thanks Sam, your right most people don't understand this stuff (even many titorite's)......Thank you for serving. All American citizen's are obligated to protect The Constitution against enemies foreign and DOMESTIC. You have great ideas! for argument sakes lets just say he did create a tree of new timelines, lets start with his alleged first jump to the 1970's, what if that was the first split off (which could be why Y2K never hit us, divergence was changed) then he travels forward (1998) but within that newly created tree of timelines, creates a new branch off out of that tree line and then goes forward again on that one (early 2000's). In may opinion the MWI is the best leading theory on the subject. Which is why multiple JT would need to share Divergence info in order to try to not to change things to dramatically. He knew his flight data was being recorded and he knew he would be in big trouble upon returning to 2036. Which I think he never returned to, would you ? ( I don't blame him ). Even if he did, it was probably to a timeline were he was not originally in the military and the mission had not taken place there. You are right on the reason his predictions are off by a few years and others are misses altogether. The reason behind this is that a timeline that is off by 1% divergence compared to another timeline is only 1% different compared to that timeline so things will be off a little like the timing of things but a timeline that has 3%-5% difference in divergence compared to another timeline things he predicted might be a total miss altogether there. Keep in mind we are in agreement he did create branch off of timelines. which is why civil war and ww3 are around the corner for us now instead of 2000-2004, back then we had 9/11 and Iraq instead... we did not get civil war in 2000 because of something he did 1970's related to the IBM 5100 (which caused that split off) and averted Y2K for us. I can only think that he at sometime wanted to fix things in the future but instead just delayed things, (realized that) regretted it tried to re fix things back to original and in the process made things worse and also encountered other johns trying to do the same thing, which he knew would happen. The last thing I wanted to add in my opinion when a split off (branch off happens) then newly created time lines are not aware that they have been newly created they just pick off with the same history as original they split off from it's only their futures that change from that point and on (the branch off event). I don't know which one we are in but most likely we are in one that split off from 1970's or 1998, with a divergence 2%-4% off from JT original timeline, the problem is he made things happen.......which changes things a bit. Also just for fun are you aware of Y2038 it's a the Y2K of the year 2038....
Glad to discuss this subject with you !
Ding, Ding, Ding...BINGO! You guys hit it on the nose! Most people just don't get any of this.
Yes, 2038 will be another Y2K if it is not prevented.
And I believe the reason we knew about Y2K is because John told his grandfather. That information was shared and trickled down to the entire population, who corrected the problem before anything major happened. Y2K was fixed and DIVERTED on our Timeline, and that information came from John Titor in 1975.
You and Anonynez are 2 of the few who have figured this out.
I think they started working on y2k in the 1970's he was related to some one over at IBM which is why he was chosen. I believe he told that person and that was the event that caused the split off. Also another TT talked about Y2038 he was on Art Bell.....