Something else that I think is worth mentioning, is the means of encryption also utilize context as a sort of key code or safe guard. Unless you already know, it makes no sense. You cannot hack it like you can other methods. So the things you are figuring out, you are doing so with a handicap and still able to detect something is there.
This is a possibility, I would agree, but still doesn't mean I can't figure it out.
Without key necessary information, you are only going to get so far with it. ...which isn't very far. What I am trying to say to you is that when most people are lost, don't realize they are looking at something, you do. You don't know exactly what, and you won't figure it out, but you suspect it means something.
Do you remember that quirky thing my 6th grade Social Studies teacher used to do? Do you remember how our class would respond to her when she did it?
Of course not. You have no idea because you cannot, because you don't even know who she is and weren't there to witness any of it. So if I were to make a cryptic reference to it, the only people who would understand are those who were there. This would also tell anyone who understood it that the person writing it was also one of a list of people who were there.
Context and logic would be used as a means of encryption. Anyone not there would first have to recognize it as having meaning (not likely), and then would have to find out what it's about, which would mean going back in time to spy on people, then back to the future to insert a cryptic reference into something, pretending to be part of the class. That is not easy to duplicate or fool someone. One slip and a fraud would be detected.
For anyone not privy to seeing it all, it is meaningless. They have no idea what is transpiring.
There are examples of Titor doing that, trying to fake it, pretending to be a part of something he/she wasn't. But until now you probably never considered any of these things.
Last edited: