@MeditationSync - Sounds like you've bought too much into Wikipedia and mainstream historians, both of which tend to be biased.
That's what you think. I find Ancient Aliens much more accurate than what mainstream historians want us to believe.
I'll admit in the beginning I bought into the "Anicent Alien Theory"...
@MeditationSync - Sounds like you've bought too much into Wikipedia and mainstream historians, both of which tend to be biased.
Yes. So did I. However, after studying real history (or, rather, what some would call "biased mainstream history") I came to a different conclusion.
Study alone was not the main thing which prompted me to abandon the ancient astronaut theory, though. It was also the disrespect shown to our human ancestors. It is as if the AA theorists are all saying, "Humans were way too stupid back then, and way too lacking in imagination, to have made these things - therefore, aliens must have."
Even if I were to grant that our ancestors were morons (and I don't) it still would not follow that alien intervention would be the only explanation.
Yes. So did I. However, after studying real history (or, rather, what some would call "biased mainstream history") I came to a different conclusion.
Study alone was not the main thing which prompted me to abandon the ancient astronaut theory, though. It was also the disrespect shown to our human ancestors. It is as if the AA theorists are all saying, "Humans were way too stupid back then, and way too lacking in imagination, to have made these things - therefore, aliens."
@taykair - Yet humans could not have come up with those great advances out of thin air...
...I never rely on Wikipedia as a firm source.
Then you think so without trying to check.That's what you think. I find Ancient Aliens much more accurate than what mainstream historians want us to believe.